Medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong · Last reviewed · 5 min read · Jump to questions
Published 24 September 2026 · Reviewed by Dr Sin Yong · All articles by Dr Sin Yong

The two lines that bother people most — the nasolabial fold running from nose to mouth corner, and the marionette line running from mouth corner toward the jaw — share a secret: they are mostly not problems of the crease itself. They are where descending midface tissue comes to rest. Treat the crease and ignore the descent, and the lower face can end up looking heavy. Treat the cause, and the crease softens almost as a side effect.

Smile lines, or nasolabial folds, usually reflect three things: lost volume in the cheek compartments above them, laxity of the skin and soft tissue, and repeated muscle movement around the mouth. Getting rid of smile lines means treating whichever dominates, often cheek support first, rather than filling the crease alone. Some line is normal in every adult face.
Smile lines are the creases running from the sides of the nose to the corners of the mouth, called nasolabial folds in medicine. Getting rid of smile lines completely is not realistic; softening them means treating the cause: lost cheek support, laxity or muscle movement. Filling the crease alone often disappoints.
Rohrich and Pessa's 2007 study of thirty hemifacial cadaver dissections established that facial fat is not one sheet but a mosaic of separate compartments — and they age separately. The midface compartments deflate and slide downward and inward with the years; the nasolabial fold is quite literally where that migrating tissue folds against the fixed anatomy around the mouth. The marionette line is the same story one act later, with the added pull of the depressor anguli oris muscle dragging the mouth corners down. Neither line is primarily a 'line problem' — they are the visible creases of a structural shift happening above them. A 2018 web-based survey of 3,553 adults who rated their own faces against photonumeric scales found that a greater midface volume deficit went with more severe nasolabial folds, after allowing for age.
Direct filler into a deep fold does something — but the physics is unforgiving. The tissue above the fold is still descending, still pressing down; filler placed only in the crease lifts the crease floor toward tissue that keeps arriving. Chase the fold with syringe after syringe and the whole zone grows heavy, blurring the border between cheek and mouth — the overfilled lower face that photographs so unkindly. Restraint here is not caution for its own sake; it is respect for where the tissue is coming from.
“The nasolabial fold is where the descending cheek lands. Filling the landing site while ignoring the descent is how faces get heavy.”
Dr Sin YongOn treating causes, not creases
Cause-first treatment starts higher: restoring the deflated cheek compartments and lateral support so that less tissue collapses onto the fold in the first place. Structural volumisation at the midface, lifting energy where laxity dominates, threads where a vector of reposition helps — the combination is chosen by what the assessment finds, and a modest amount of direct fold work then finishes what the structural work began. For marionette heaviness, relaxing an overactive DAO adds a subtle but real upturn to the mouth corners. The consistent principle: the crease receives the least filler of anywhere in the plan. At the clinic on Orchard Road, Singapore, Dr Sin Yong plans and performs each step himself; the options for the fold itself are set out under nasolabial folds treatment Singapore.
Smile lines and marionette lines sit close together but have different drivers, so they are planned differently. Smile lines are mostly about the cheek above them. Marionette lines involve the jowl, the muscle that pulls the mouth corner down and the support around the chin.
| Smile lines (nasolabial folds) | Marionette lines | |
|---|---|---|
| Main driver | Deflated, descended cheek fat pressing on the fold | Jowl descent, a downturned mouth corner and loss of chin support |
| First step usually considered | Restoring cheek support above the fold | Support beside the chin and at the jowl border, and assessing the jowl |
| Muscle factor | Small: the fold is mainly tissue position | Larger: the muscle that pulls the mouth corner down can be relaxed with small doses of botulinum toxin |
| Lifting | Where midface laxity is present | Where the jowl is the main cause |
| Filler into the line itself | A small amount, after support, if a crease remains | Cautious: too much adds weight to the lower face |
Most faces have both lines, and they are planned together, because supporting the cheek also changes how much tissue reaches the jowl. The fold itself is treated last, if at all. Where the jowl dominates the lower face, the options for it are set out on jowls and lower face sagging; for the fold on its own, see nasolabial folds treatment.
Dr Sin Yong assesses both lines at rest and in a smile, and checks for earlier filler with ultrasound before adding anything, because a heavy-looking lower face is sometimes old product rather than lost support.
Smile lines at a young age are usually normal anatomy rather than early ageing. Every face that smiles folds at the nasolabial line, and in some faces the fold shows at rest from the twenties. Bone shape, cheek fullness, expression habits and weight change decide how early it appears, and a large online study of adults found that the more volume the midface had lost, the deeper the smile lines were rated.
A crease that appears only when you smile is different from a fold that stays at rest. A groove running diagonally across the mid-cheek is not the smile line, and a dip in front of the jowl is not the marionette line, although both are mistaken for them. Fine vertical lines on the lips are a separate skin-quality problem. In a face that has had filler before, heaviness beside the mouth is sometimes old product, which is why earlier filler is checked before anything is added.
Daily sunscreen, not smoking and keeping your weight steady protect the skin and support. A retinoid can refine surface lines. No cream, gua sha tool or face exercise changes a fold cast by bone and fat position.
A sudden change on one side, such as one smile line flattening or one corner of the mouth drooping, is a medical emergency until stroke or facial nerve palsy is excluded. Pain, blanching or dusky skin after filler needs the injecting doctor the same day. Otherwise, assessment is a choice: the options are set out on nasolabial folds treatment, marionette lines treatment and cheek fillers.
Done cause-first, the change reads as 'rested' rather than 'done' — the shadow of the fold lightens, the mouth corners stop looking stern, and the cheek regains the gentle forward curve that photographs as youth. The fold itself does not vanish; a visible nasolabial line is present in every adult face, including twenty-year-old ones, and erasing it entirely is neither possible nor desirable. Anyone promising a creaseless lower face is promising a strange one.
Related
Guide: thread lift Singapore — what PDO, PCL and PLLA threads can and cannot do, and when the VF Lift fits instead.
Skincare and face exercises cannot remove a smile line, because the main causes sit deeper than either reaches. A nasolabial fold forms where descending cheek tissue meets the fixed anatomy around the mouth; no cream restores deflated fat compartments, and no exercise reverses laxity in the supporting tissue.
Skincare still has a role at the level of the skin. Daily sunscreen limits ultraviolet damage to collagen, and a prescription or over-the-counter retinoid can improve fine surface lines and texture over months, but neither changes the depth of a fold cast by a shift in volume. Facial exercise programmes are popular, yet the evidence for them is limited, and repeated strong smiling and puckering work the same muscles that deepen expression lines. Massage tools and tapes may reduce puffiness briefly without changing structure. Rapid weight loss and smoking also influence how the lower face ages. Where a line bothers you, assessment identifies which of volume, laxity or movement is driving it, and that decides whether filler, energy-based lifting, threads or botulinum toxin is relevant at all.
| Option | What it does | What it cannot do | Typical recovery | Who it tends to suit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midface structural volumisation (dermal filler in the cheek) | Restores support in deflated cheek compartments so less tissue folds onto the nasolabial line | Does not tighten lax skin or change muscle pull at the mouth corners | Possible swelling or bruising at injection points that settles | Smile lines driven mainly by volume loss in the cheek |
| Direct filler in the fold, in moderation | Softens the remaining shadow once structural support is in place | Cannot counter tissue still descending from above; repeated filling makes the lower face heavy | As for other filler | A residual crease after midface work |
| Energy-based lifting, such as VF Lift – Vertical Facelift (Volnewmer monopolar radiofrequency) | Heats the dermis and subcutaneous layer to prompt collagen remodelling where laxity dominates | Does not replace lost volume or relax muscle | Usually transient redness and warmth | Lines linked to laxity and loss of firmness |
| Thread lift (The Bliss Lift) | Absorbable threads reposition descended midface tissue along a chosen vector | Does not restore volume or improve skin quality | Swelling, tenderness or bruising along the thread paths | Moderate descent where repositioning helps |
| Botulinum toxin to the depressor anguli oris | Relaxes the muscle that pulls the mouth corners down | Does not treat the nasolabial fold itself or replace volume | Small injection marks; the effect develops over the following days | Marionette lines with downturned mouth corners |
| Surgical facelift (referred to a plastic surgery specialist) | Repositions deeper tissue and removes excess skin surgically | Is not a non-surgical option, and does not restore volume on its own | A formal surgical recovery set by the operating team | Advanced laxity beyond what non-surgical approaches address |
Chiefly the age-related deflation and descent of the cheek's fat compartments — the folds are where that migrating tissue creases against fixed anatomy around the mouth. Muscle pull (the DAO dragging mouth corners down) and skin-quality change contribute, particularly to marionette lines.
No — and it should not try. Every adult face has some nasolabial line; erasing it entirely requires so much filler that the lower face turns heavy and unnatural. The realistic goal is a softer shadow and a rebalanced midface, not a creaseless one.
Usually proportion: adding volume in the wrong plane or place can push tissue toward the fold, deepening its shadow. It is also possible to become more critical of a zone once attention is drawn to it. A structural review maps what is actually contributing before adding anything further.
It depends on the dominant cause: structural support and careful volumisation where descent dominates, DAO relaxation where muscle pull turns the corners down, skin-quality treatment where fine crepiness is the issue — and usually a measured combination. The right choice is what your anatomy needs, which is what assessment decides.
Rarely. Most nasolabial and marionette concerns in the thirties to fifties are managed non-surgically with structural volumisation, energy-based lifting and muscle rebalancing. Advanced laxity does exist, and an honest assessment will say when surgical consultation makes more sense than more filler.
How long structural volumisation is maintained varies with the product, area and individual; muscle-relaxant effects wear off over time; energy-based lifting builds collagen over months with periodic maintenance. Plans are usually staged rather than delivered as one large session.
Yes — that is the core of the anatomy. Restoring midface support reduces the load of tissue folding onto the nasolabial line, and the fold softens from above. It is often the first step considered in a lower-face plan.
Serial direct filling of the same crease without structural review. Each syringe seems reasonable; the sum is heaviness. If a fold keeps 'needing' filler every few months, the plan — not the product — deserves re-examination.
A faint nasolabial line is visible in most faces from youth, especially when smiling, and it is normal. It tends to deepen from the thirties onwards as the cheek compartments lose volume and descend, though genetics, facial structure, sun exposure, smoking and weight change shift the timing considerably. What is causing the line in your face matters more than your age.
Not for the nasolabial fold itself. Botulinum toxin relaxes muscle, and the fold is mainly caused by volume loss and descent, so relaxing the muscles around it can flatten the smile and look unnatural. Botulinum toxin does have a role for marionette lines, where relaxing the depressor anguli oris lifts downturned mouth corners, and for a gummy smile, which is a separate concern.
They can. Losing facial fat, particularly quickly, reduces support in the cheek and lets the fold look deeper, which is why significant weight loss sometimes changes the lower face more than people expect. Where weight has changed, the plan accounts for where volume has been lost rather than simply adding filler to the crease.
Question not answered here? Ask on WhatsApp, use the enquiry form, or browse 100 questions patients ask.
Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119(7):2219–2227. source
Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2012. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Relationship Between Midface Volume Deficits and the Appearance of Tear Troughs and Nasolabial Folds. Dermatologic Surgery, 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Anatomical changes in the East Asian midface skeleton with aging. Folia Morphologica, 2017. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Lower-face lines are traced to their structural cause before treatment. Consultations on Orchard Road, Singapore.
The treatment itself is explained on Nasolabial Fold Treatment Singapore.
Replies within clinic hours: Mon–Fri 10am–8pm, Sat 11am–3pm · How consultations work · Prefer not to use WhatsApp? · Treatment finder · Call +65 8023 7170 · Map
WhatsApp +65 8023 7170 →