Submental fullness is not one problem. It can be fat, skin laxity, the position of the platysma, or the underlying jaw and chin structure — and the four look similar from outside while responding to entirely different approaches.
Patients searching for double chin removal or how to get rid of a double chin are describing what they see in the mirror. It says nothing about what is producing it, and that is the first thing to establish.
Subcutaneous fat in the submental compartment is the cause most people assume. It is common, but it is not the only one, and treating it when it is not the driver produces no visible change.
Skin laxity behaves differently. Where the skin envelope has lost elasticity, removing fat beneath it can make the appearance worse rather than better.
Platysma position and chin projection are structural. A recessed chin shortens the submental angle, so the area reads as full even in someone lean.
Where fat is the driver, energy that reaches the adipose layer is the relevant tool. Microwave energy at 2.45 GHz is preferentially absorbed by fat, and radiofrequency contouring works on the same compartment by a different route.
Where laxity is the driver, focused ultrasound at SMAS depth or radiofrequency dermal heating addresses the envelope rather than its contents.
Where structure is the driver, chin projection changes the submental angle and jawline definition itself. This is the one most often missed.
Many patients present with more than one, which is why a single-device answer to a double chin is usually the wrong one.
“A weak chin and a full neck look the same in a photograph. They are not the same problem, and they do not respond to the same treatment.”
Dr Sin YongOn assessing the submental region
Treatment is planned individually, so the cost follows the plan rather than a fixed list. Four things shape it:
A figure quoted before assessment would not reflect your presentation. Cost is set out clearly at consultation, before anything is agreed.
Submental fullness has four common causes: subcutaneous fat in the submental compartment, loss of skin elasticity, the position of the platysma muscle, and the projection of the underlying chin and jaw. They look similar externally and respond to different treatments, which is why assessment comes before any plan.
Non-surgical approaches exist for each of the common causes. Energy that reaches the adipose layer addresses fat; focused ultrasound and radiofrequency address laxity; augmentation of chin projection addresses the structural component. Which applies depends on what is producing the fullness in the individual case.
The most common reason is that the treatment addressed a cause that was not present. Fat-directed treatment produces little change where the driver is skin laxity or a recessed chin. Establishing the cause first is what makes the difference.
Weight change affects the fat component but not the others. Someone lean with a recessed chin or lax submental skin will still see fullness in the area. This is why assessment distinguishes the components rather than assuming one.
Cost depends on which cause is being addressed, whether more than one applies, and how the plan is staged. Since the appropriate approach differs between patients, a figure given before assessment would be misleading. Pricing is discussed at consultation.
No. Suitability is assessed in person, and some presentations are better served by surgical referral than by non-surgical treatment. Medical history, the degree of laxity and the underlying structure all inform that judgement.
Consultations by appointment at Orchard Road, Singapore.
WhatsApp +65 8023 7170 →