Versus · Lifting

Oligio vs Thermage vs Volnewmer:
three monopolar radiofrequency platforms, one mechanism

Medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong · Last reviewed · 9 min read · Jump to questions

What Oligio is on its own, including the newer Oligio X, is explained separately.

Published 20 October 2026 · Reviewed by Dr Sin Yong

Illustrative image for monopolar radiofrequency skin tightening — not a patient

Oligio vs Thermage vs Volnewmer is a comparison of three monopolar radiofrequency platforms that share one mechanism: a 6.78 MHz current passed from a treatment tip through the skin to a return pad, heating the dermis and the fibrous septa beneath it as a volume. They differ in surface cooling, the tips supplied and the protocol run on them. Oligio is not used here; Thermage FLX and Volnewmer are.

Short answerAll three are 6.78 MHz monopolar radiofrequency devices cleared on the same regulatory pathway, and Oligio and Volnewmer both cite Thermage FLX as their predicate. The differences are cryogen versus water cooling, tip sizes, and what the doctor does with the energy. On Volnewmer, the protocol here is the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift.

Part of Versus →

Key facts
Shared mechanism
6.78 MHz monopolar radiofrequency heating the dermis and subdermal fibrous septa volumetrically, with a return pad completing the circuit
Oligio
Made by WONTECH, Korea; FDA 510(k) K221989 (2022) with Thermage FLX as predicate; cooling gas at the tip; not used at this practice
Thermage FLX
Made by Solta Medical; FDA 510(k) K170758 (2017); cryogen bursts before, during and after each pulse; face, eye and body tips
Volnewmer
Made by CLASSYS, Korea; FDA 510(k) K240248 (2024) with Thermage FLX as predicate; integrated water cooling; 0.25, 3, 4 and 16 cm² tips
Protocol here
Volnewmer carries the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift, planned zone by zone; Thermage FLX is used with its face, eye and body tips; neither is focused ultrasound
On this page
  1. What do Oligio, Thermage and Volnewmer have in common?
  2. How do the tips and cooling differ between the three?
  3. What is each platform cleared for, and what is it used for?
  4. How does the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift use Volnewmer?
  5. Who suits monopolar radiofrequency, and what decides the plan?
  6. Frequently Asked Questions
  7. Related
  8. Speak With Dr Sin Yong

What do Oligio, Thermage and Volnewmer have in common?

The three machines are closer relatives than their marketing suggests. Each is a monopolar radiofrequency generator at 6.78 MHz: an alternating current leaves a single treatment tip, passes through the full thickness of skin and fat beneath it, and returns through a pad placed on the body. Tissue resists the current, resistance makes heat, and the heat is produced as a volume rather than at a point. Heated collagen contracts, and fibroblasts respond by laying down new collagen, which is the remodelling every monopolar device relies on. None of them focuses ultrasound, places discrete coagulation points, or reaches the SMAS the way HIFU does.

OligioThermage FLXVolnewmer
MakerWONTECH Co., Ltd., KoreaSolta Medical, USACLASSYS Inc., Korea
US clearance510(k) K221989, October 2022; predicate Thermage FLX510(k) K170758, September 2017510(k) K240248, April 2024; predicate Thermage FLX
Frequency6.78 MHz6.78 MHz6.78 MHz
Surface coolingConductive cooling of the epidermis with a cooling gas and coupling fluidCryogen bursts before, during and after each pulseIntegrated continuous water cooling at the tip
Tips listed in the filingDisposable tips; sizes not stated in the summaryDisposable tips; face, eye and body tips in clinical use0.25, 3, 4 and 16 cm² tips
Maximum output stated145 W400 W average115 W
Used at this practiceNoYesYes, as the platform for the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift

The regulatory trail says most of what matters. Both Korean platforms were cleared by comparison with Thermage FLX, which means the authority accepted that they do the same thing in substantially the same way. What a patient feels, and what the doctor can do, comes down to cooling, tips and protocol.

How do the tips and cooling differ between the three?

Cooling is the engineering difference that patients can actually feel. Every monopolar device has to protect the epidermis while the layer beneath it is heated, and the three solve that problem differently.

Illustrative image — How do the tips and cooling differ between the three?; not a patient
Illustrative image — not a patient.

Cryogen versus water

Thermage FLX fires a short burst of cryogen onto the skin before, during and after each pulse, so the surface is chilled in time with the energy. Oligio also lists a cooling gas and coupling fluid in its filing. Volnewmer runs water continuously through the tip, so the surface is cooled throughout delivery rather than pulse by pulse, and the energy can be given in a continuous emission rather than as separate shots. The Volnewmer page describes what that feels like in the chair; the Thermage vs Volnewmer comparison sets the two used here side by side.

Tip size and what it allows

A tip is the footprint of each pulse. Thermage FLX is planned with a face tip, an eye tip and a body tip. Volnewmer's filing lists four sizes: a 0.25 cm² tip for the eyes, nose and marionette lines, a 3 cm² tip for the jawline and chin, a 4 cm² tip for the face and a 16 cm² tip for the abdomen, arms and thighs. Oligio's summary does not state its tip dimensions. A small tip lets the doctor treat a narrow zone such as the upper lid or the edge of the jaw deliberately; a large tip covers a thigh in a reasonable time. Neither is better in the abstract, which is why the choice follows the zone.

Energy tuning

Thermage FLX tunes impedance in real time across varying tissue, with vibration and a skin-contact monitor; Oligio lists adjustable handpiece vibration; Volnewmer is described by its maker as continuous radiation with water cooling. All three are operated by hand or footswitch, pass by pass, guided by the patient's report of heat. Vibration and cooling are comfort features; the clinical variable is where the heat goes, and that is set by the frequency, which the three share.

“Oligio, Thermage and Volnewmer heat the same layer at the same frequency. I do not choose between badges; I choose which zone gets heat, how much, and in which direction.”

Dr Sin YongOn comparing monopolar radiofrequency platforms

What is each platform cleared for, and what is it used for?

The US clearances are narrower than the advertising. Oligio and Volnewmer are cleared for dermatologic procedures requiring electrocoagulation and haemostasis of soft tissue, the same wording as the original Thermage indication. Thermage FLX additionally carries the non-invasive treatment of wrinkles and rhytids, including the periorbital area and the upper and lower eyelids, and, with its vibration mode, a temporary improvement in the appearance of cellulite. In Singapore, all energy devices of this class are regulated as medical devices by the Health Sciences Authority and must be registered before supply, and the treatment itself must be performed by a registered doctor in licensed premises.

In practice the three are marketed for the same concern: mild to moderate skin laxity of the face, neck and body in a patient whose skin still recoils. The published record is deepest for Thermage, which has two decades of studies behind it, beginning with the multicentre periorbital study of 2003. Volnewmer has a small number of recent Korean studies describing continuous 115 W, 6.78 MHz treatment measured with three-dimensional imaging. Oligio has clinical use in Korea and Singapore but little in the indexed literature under its own name.

Computational modelling and porcine histology published in 2025 found that 6.78 MHz produced localised heating along the fibrous septa within the subcutaneous fat, while 2 MHz produced broader, deeper bulk heating within the fat, with no adipocyte death at either setting. Since all three platforms on this page run at 6.78 MHz, they heat the same scaffolding. The device with a second, 2 MHz frequency is XERF, which belongs to a different comparison on the CLASSYS Global Key Opinion Leader page.

Oligio vs Thermage: a verdict by situation

Oligio vs Thermage is a comparison between two machines that do the same thing: both pass 6.78 MHz monopolar radiofrequency through the skin to heat the dermis and the fibrous septa beneath it, and Oligio was cleared in the United States with Thermage FLX as its predicate. So the verdict rarely turns on the machine. It turns on whether monopolar radiofrequency suits your face at all, and then on cooling, tips, the protocol and who holds the handpiece. Oligio is not used at this practice; Thermage FLX and Volnewmer are, so the third column is the platform you would actually be offered here.

Your situationOligioThermage FLXHere instead, or as well
Early laxity in skin that still recoilsSame mechanism; suitsSuits; deepest published recordThermage FLX, or the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift on Volnewmer
Crepey eyelid skinTip sizes for the lids not stated in its US summaryDedicated eye tip; periorbital use in its US clearanceThermage for the eyes, or Volnewmer's 0.25 cm² tip
A lean face that hollows easilyHeat must be zoned and conservativeSame cautionVF Lift planned zone by zone, with Restore zones that are not tightened
Laxity plus puffiness from a fat pad or settled fillerTightening alone does not reduce fatSameFiller mapped with ultrasound first; Time Freeze Laser LCLR® for compact fat
Deeper laxity along the jaw or under the chinDoes not reach the SMAS like focused ultrasoundSameUltherapy Prime or Ultraformer MPT where focused ultrasound suits
Heavy jowls or redundant skinBeyond any monopolar deviceSameReferral for a surgical opinion
A pacemaker or metal implant in the fieldNot suitableNot suitableA different, non-electrical route is discussed

If you are comparing quotes for the two, ask which model and tip are being used, whether the device is registered with the Health Sciences Authority, how energy is set across each zone, and whether a doctor performs the treatment. A badge on the machine tells you less than those answers. What Oligio is, and the newer Oligio X model, is explained on the Oligio Singapore page.

How does the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift use Volnewmer?

A platform is only a generator; the protocol is what the doctor does with it. On Volnewmer, the treatment at this practice is the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift, a monopolar radiofrequency protocol developed by Dr Sin Yong and presented at the CLASSYS APAC 2026 International Conference, where he was invited to share his clinical expertise with physicians from across the region. It uses no focused ultrasound.

Illustrative image — How does the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift use Volnewmer?; not a patient
Illustrative image — not a patient.

The face is divided into zones, and each zone is heated along a vertical vector with the energy calibrated to one of three aims: Lift where the skin and septa have loosened, Reduce where there is excess puffiness from a fat pad or settled filler, and Restore where the cheek has deflated and collagen and adipose stem cells are to be stimulated rather than tightened. The point of planning this way is that a slim face is not treated like a full one; the same device at the same setting can tighten one face and hollow another. Before any energy is planned, Dr Sin Yong palpates the thickness of skin and fat in each zone, and where earlier filler is suspected he maps it with ultrasound first. Hyaluronic acid filler that is causing puffiness is dissolved before any heat. On the body the same protocol is called the VF Lift – Vertical Figure Lift and uses the 16 cm² tip with more conservative heat.

Thermage FLX is used here as its own treatment, with the face, eye or body tip chosen for the area, and the Thermage page sets out who it suits. Where both appear in a plan they are separate treatments on separate days. Oligio could in principle carry a zone-by-zone protocol too; it simply is not the platform in this clinic, and nothing on this page should be read as a claim about results on it.

Who suits monopolar radiofrequency, and what decides the plan?

Because the three share a mechanism, they share a patient. Monopolar radiofrequency suits skin that still recoils when pinched, laxity rather than lost volume, and a patient who wants a route with no incisions and no injected product. It acts on the skin envelope and the fibrous network beneath it, and on nothing else.

The downtime pattern is similar across the three: warmth and pinkness that settle, occasional mild swelling, and uncommonly a small blister or a tender spot where a pulse stacked. Lasting redness, a change in contour or any numbness is seen by Dr Sin Yong. What decides the plan is not the badge on the machine but which layer has descended, how thick the skin and fat are in each zone, what has been placed in the face before, and whether another protocol is staged alongside. The sagging face treatment guide walks through that assessment, and radiofrequency treatment in Singapore explains how monopolar differs from bipolar and microneedle radiofrequency.

Your next step
  1. 1. MessageWhatsApp +65 8023 7170 with what is bothering you. A reply comes from the clinic, not a bot.
  2. 2. AssessmentDr Sin Yong examines you himself on Orchard Road, with ultrasound where earlier filler is involved.
  3. 3. A plan in writingWhat he would do, what he would not, the fee factors, and the option of no treatment.

Every treatment is performed by Dr Sin Yong personally. Singapore Medical Council registered · invited to share his clinical expertise internationally for CLASSYS, DEKA, Fotona, Hironic and Ilooda.

Bring a note of any device, filler or thread already placed in the face; it changes which zones are heated and in what order. How consultations work.

WhatsApp Dr Sin Yong →or use the enquiry form

Frequently Asked Questions

Clinics set their own fees, and this practice does not offer Oligio, so it cannot compare them for you. What changes any monopolar radiofrequency fee is the tip, the number of pulses or zones, who performs the treatment and whether a review is included. Ask what a quote contains rather than comparing headline figures, because two quotes often describe different amounts of treatment.
Comfort depends on the energy chosen, the area and the cooling. Oligio cools the surface with a cooling gas and coupling fluid, Thermage FLX with cryogen bursts timed to each pulse, and Volnewmer with continuous water cooling. All three are felt as heat that builds and then eases. No head-to-head comfort trial between Oligio and Thermage was found, so a claim that one does not hurt is not backed by a direct comparison.
In Singapore, energy devices of this class are regulated as medical devices by the Health Sciences Authority and must be registered before they are supplied, and treatment must be done by a registered doctor in licensed premises. Ask the clinic which Oligio model it uses and for its registration. Oligio is not used at this practice, which uses Thermage FLX and Volnewmer for monopolar radiofrequency.

Not the same machine, but the same class. Oligio is a 6.78 MHz monopolar radiofrequency device made by WONTECH in Korea, cleared in the United States in 2022 by comparison with Thermage FLX as its predicate. Both heat the dermis and fibrous septa as a volume and cool the surface with a gas. They differ in tips, power and the protocol a clinic runs on them. Oligio is not used at this practice.

Neither has been shown to outperform the other in a head-to-head trial, and this page makes no such claim. Both run at 6.78 MHz with a return pad; Volnewmer cools the surface with continuous water and supplies four tip sizes, Thermage FLX uses cryogen bursts pulse by pulse. Which is planned for a given face depends on the zones involved and whether the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift protocol suits it.

No. The monopolar radiofrequency platforms used here are Volnewmer, which carries the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift and the VF Lift – Vertical Figure Lift for the body, and Thermage FLX with its face, eye and body tips. Oligio is described on this page so that a patient comparing clinics can see what the three devices share and where they differ.

No. HIFU focuses ultrasound to small coagulation points at set depths, including the SMAS, and leaves the tissue between those points largely unheated. Monopolar radiofrequency heats the dermis and the fibrous septa broadly, as a volume, and does not place points at the SMAS. They are not rivals for the same job, and the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift uses no ultrasound.

Anyone with a pacemaker, defibrillator or other implanted electronic device, because the current passes through the body to a return pad; anyone with metal implants in the treatment field; pregnant women; and anyone with infected, broken or inflamed skin in the area. Recent filler or threads do not rule treatment out but change the plan, which is why the face is examined, and mapped with ultrasound where needed, first.

References

510(k) K221989: The Oligio radiofrequency therapy system (WON TECH Co., Ltd.); predicate Thermage FLX K170758. US Food and Drug Administration, 510(k) Premarket Notification, 2022. source

510(k) K240248: Volnewmer (Classys, Inc.); predicate Thermage FLX K170758. US Food and Drug Administration, 510(k) Premarket Notification, 2024. source

510(k) K170758: Thermage FLX System and Accessories (Solta Medical, Inc.). US Food and Drug Administration, 510(k) Premarket Notification, 2017. source

Computational modeling and histologic analysis of 6.78- and 2-MHz monopolar radiofrequency-induced thermal reactions. Lasers in Medical Science, 2025. source

Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2003. source

About this page: written and medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong, MBBS (NUS), MRCS (Edinburgh) · Last reviewed 20 October 2026 · Illustrative images only, not patients · Editorial policy

Explore Further

Speak With Dr Sin Yong

Consultations by appointment at Orchard Road, Singapore.

  1. 1WhatsApp a short note on your concern
  2. 2Consultation and assessment with Dr Sin Yong
  3. 3Options explained, including no treatment

Replies within clinic hours: Mon–Fri 10am–8pm, Sat 11am–3pm · How consultations work · Prefer not to use WhatsApp? · Treatment finder

WhatsApp +65 8023 7170 →
Follow Dr Sin Yong
InstagramTikTokYouTubeThreadsXLinkedInFacebook
Dr Sin Yong · Every treatment personally performed
WhatsApp Enquiry