Juvelook · Cost factors

Juvelook cost in Singapore: product, areas and what is found first

Medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong · Last reviewed · 6 min read · Jump to questions

Published 31 October 2026 · Reviewed by Dr Sin Yong

Illustrative image of a woman in her thirties with luminous skin, not a patient

Juvelook cost in Singapore is set by the plan the examination produces: whether the concern is skin quality or volume, whether Juvelook or Juvelook Volume fits, the areas, how the product is diluted and placed, whether earlier filler needs attention first, and the review. Singapore's rules restrict fee advertising, so no figure appears here. Dr Sin Yong quotes in writing after examining you on Orchard Road.

Part of Juvelook →

Key facts
Fee basis
A written plan after Dr Sin Yong has examined the face and asked what has been injected before; no figure from a photograph
Products
Juvelook (50 mg vial) for skin quality and fine texture; Juvelook Volume, sold internationally as Lenisna (200 mg), for structure
What it is
Poly-D,L-lactic acid (PDLLA) microspheres in non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid, made by VAIM in Korea
Not dissolvable in full
Hyaluronidase breaks down the hyaluronic acid carrier but not the PDLLA
Often not the plan
Dr Sin Yong prefers FSX Laser for the skin and the Restore arm of the VF Lift for hollow areas where they fit
On this page
  1. Why is there no Juvelook figure on this page?
  2. Skin quality or volume: which product, and which areas
  3. Dilution, placement and staging: the work inside the plan
  4. When the plan is not Juvelook, or is correcting it
  5. How to compare Juvelook quotes, and what is not charged
  6. Frequently Asked Questions
  7. Related
  8. Speak With Dr Sin Yong

Why is there no Juvelook figure on this page?

Singapore's rules on medical advertising restrict how doctors publish fees, and the Juvelook plan depends on what the examination finds, so a figure in advance would describe a product rather than a plan. Juvelook is a collagen-stimulating injectable that sits between a skin booster and a volumising filler: its hyaluronic acid gives hydration on the day, and its PDLLA prompts the skin to lay down collagen over the following months.

The quote is written after assessment, it can be taken home, and no decision is asked for at the first visit. The consultation is a medical visit with its own fee, stated when you book, and it can end with the advice that another tool, or no injection, suits better. The practice-wide rules are on how fees are quoted, and the related collagen stimulator is costed on Sculptra cost factors.

Skin quality or volume: which product, and which areas

The first Juvelook cost factor is the concern, because skin quality and fine texture suit Juvelook, while deeper volume and structure suit Juvelook Volume, which carries 170 mg of PDLLA per 200 mg vial against 42.5 mg in a 50 mg Juvelook vial, according to the manufacturer. Sagging is a lifting problem, and more product is the wrong answer to it.

Illustrative image of luminous skin, not a patient
Illustrative image — not a patient.
What the examination findsWhat is usually consideredEffect on the plan
Dull skin, fine lines and textureJuvelook for skin quality, or FSX Laser where energy-based treatment fitsProduct and dilution chosen for skin quality
Volume loss needing structureJuvelook Volume, or the Restore arm of the VF Lift for hollow areasA different product with more PDLLA per vial
Fine texture under the eyesJuvelook can be used, but FSX Laser and the VF Lift are preferred thereThinner skin and a higher bar for injecting
Sagging as the main concernA lifting protocol rather than a collagen stimulatorJuvelook not advised
Earlier filler of unknown typeUltrasound assessment before anything new is addedCorrection may come first and is itemised

Which concern is present decides the product, and the areas decide how much of it. Juvelook, Sculptra and skin boosters are compared on collagen biostimulators.

“Juvelook is a skin-quality tool first. If the real problem is sagging, more product is the wrong answer, and I will not quote for it.”

Dr Sin YongOn how Juvelook is quoted

Dilution, placement and staging: the work inside the plan

Placement, dilution and the number of sessions are set after examination, and this site does not publish session counts, because a collagen stimulator works through the body's own response, which varies between people. Dr Sin Yong performs every injection himself, and he asks what has been injected before, because collagen stimulators and hyaluronic acid layered over several years are a common reason faces look heavy.

The evidence is early, which is one reason the plan is cautious rather than generous with product. A 2026 prospective case series of 20 patients treated with Juvelook for nasolabial folds reported improvement at three months after the final treatment, with transient swelling and bruising and no nodules or granulomas. A 2024 literature review of PDLLA in dermatology highlighted granulomas and non-inflammatory nodules as potential complications and stressed monitoring and early intervention. No randomised trial comparing Juvelook with Sculptra or with hyaluronic acid filler has been published.

Reviews are part of the plan: the response is checked before any further treatment is timed, and a lump that lasts is scanned. What is expected afterwards, and what is not, is on Juvelook side effects.

When the plan is not Juvelook, or is correcting it

Dr Sin Yong prefers energy-based treatment for almost every concern that injectables are used for, because it adds no product, so a Juvelook consultation can end with a plan that contains no Juvelook. FSX Laser is used for the skin, and the Restore arm of the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift, his radiofrequency protocol on Volnewmer, for hollow areas. Where an injectable is the right choice, he says so and explains why.

Correction is costed differently from treatment. Hyaluronidase dissolves Juvelook's hyaluronic acid carrier but not the PDLLA, so excess or clustered Juvelook placed elsewhere is assessed with ultrasound and, for nodules, treated with the Sculpting mode of Time Freeze Laser LCLR®, without an incision. That plan is described on Juvelook lumps, and its fee factors on Time Freeze cost factors. A red, hot or painful lump after any injection needs a doctor the same day.

How to compare Juvelook quotes, and what is not charged

Two Juvelook quotes can only be compared when each names the product, the areas, how the product is diluted and placed, who injects it and what the review covers. A figure per vial says nothing about whether the concern needed a collagen stimulator at all. Before booking anywhere, it is reasonable to ask:

A polynucleotide skin booster is a different product, compared on Juvelook vs Rejuran. Not on a quote at this practice: packages sold on the day, promotions, incentives for reviews or referrals, and product the examination does not support. The consultation takes place at the clinic on Orchard Road, Singapore, and the plan can be taken away and considered.

Your next step
  1. 1. MessageWhatsApp +65 8023 7170 with what is bothering you. A reply comes from the clinic, not a bot.
  2. 2. AssessmentDr Sin Yong examines you himself on Orchard Road, with ultrasound where earlier filler is involved.
  3. 3. A plan in writingWhat he would do, what he would not, the fee factors, and the option of no treatment.

Every treatment is performed by Dr Sin Yong personally. Singapore Medical Council registered · invited to share his clinical expertise internationally for CLASSYS, DEKA, Fotona, Hironic and Ilooda.

Book an assessment with Dr Sin Yong on Orchard Road. How consultations work.

WhatsApp Dr Sin Yong →or use the enquiry form

Frequently Asked Questions

Singapore's rules restrict fee advertising, so no figure is given here. Juvelook cost depends on whether the concern is skin quality or volume, whether Juvelook or Juvelook Volume fits, the areas, how the product is diluted and placed, whether earlier filler needs addressing first, and the review. Dr Sin Yong sets out the fee factors in a written plan after the consultation.

Yes, because they are different products for different aims. Juvelook, in a 50 mg vial, is used for skin quality and fine texture. Juvelook Volume, sold internationally as Lenisna, comes in a 200 mg vial with more PDLLA and is used where structure, rather than surface quality, is the aim. The examination decides which, if either, suits.

The amount of product is one input, but it follows the plan rather than setting it. The concern, the areas, the dilution and placement, and whether earlier filler needs attention all shape how much Juvelook is used. A per-vial figure cannot show whether a collagen stimulator was the right choice, which is why the written plan names each element.

Yes. Dr Sin Yong can use Juvelook under the eyes for skin quality and fine texture, but he prefers energy-based treatment there: FSX Laser for the skin and the Restore arm of the VF Lift for hollow areas. Because hyaluronidase dissolves only the hyaluronic acid carrier, the bar for injecting under the eye is higher.

They are different treatments, so their quotes describe different plans. A skin booster places hydrating or regenerative material in the skin, Sculptra is a volumising collagen stimulator, and Juvelook sits between them. Which fits depends on whether the concern is the skin, the volume beneath it, or both, and the examination decides that before any fee is discussed.

Lumps or clustered Juvelook are assessed with ultrasound to see where the material sits and whether other fillers are present. Hyaluronidase dissolves the hyaluronic acid but not the PDLLA, so Dr Sin Yong treats nodules with the Sculpting mode of Time Freeze Laser LCLR®, without an incision. Correction is planned and quoted separately from new treatment.

References

A Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Injectable PDLLA for Nasolabial Fold Correction: Juvelook treatment for Nasolabial fold. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (Yi KH, Rosellini I, Min JLJ, et al.), 2026. source

Poly-d,l-lactic Acid (PDLLA) Application in Dermatology: A Literature Review. Polymers (Lee KWA, Chan LKW, Lee AWK, et al.), 2024. source

About this page: written and medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong, MBBS (NUS), MRCS (Edinburgh) · Last reviewed 6 November 2026 · Illustrative images only, not patients · Editorial policy

Explore Further

Speak With Dr Sin Yong

Consultations by appointment at Orchard Road, Singapore.

  1. 1WhatsApp a short note on your concern
  2. 2Consultation and assessment with Dr Sin Yong
  3. 3Options explained, including no treatment

Replies within clinic hours: Mon–Fri 10am–8pm, Sat 11am–3pm · How consultations work · Prefer not to use WhatsApp? · Treatment finder · Call +65 8023 7170 · Map

WhatsApp +65 8023 7170 →
Follow Dr Sin Yong
InstagramTikTokYouTubeThreadsXLinkedInFacebook
Dr Sin Yong · Every treatment personally performed
WhatsApp Enquiry